Legal Opinion
Matter of Scholtz v. Central Hanover Bk. Tr. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 23, 1946PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
Upon this appeal we are to determine whether the evidence before us is sufficient, within the requirements of s'ection 23 of the Personal Property Law, to accomplish the revocation of an inter vivas trust.
The appellant is a widow whose only child is G-eorge C. W. Scholtz — a person over twenty-one years of age, unmarried and without issue. She has two brothers, two sisters, and two nephews and a niece who are the children of a deceased brother. On December 28, 1937, there was delivered to the respondent trust company a deed of trust executed by the appellant which transferred to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Doctor v. . HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Whittemore v. Equitable Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Doane v. . Mercantile Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Engel v. Guaranty Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Smith v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Richardson v. RichardsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Culver v. Title Guarantee Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
- In re the Estate of SilverNew York Surrogate's Court · 1973
- Glanckopf v. Guaranty Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- St. George v. Fulton Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.