Legal Opinion

Smith v. Curtis

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 24, 1864PublishedCited by 1 opinion

CASE 22 — PETITION ORDINARY cited Civ. Code, sec. 153; 14 B. M., 394.

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE ROBERTSON

delivered the opinion of the court :

The circuit court erred in rendering judgment for the value of the mule, without proof or without an assessment by a jury. While all allegations of fact are admitted by the defendant’s default, no allegation of an opinion or estimate of value can be deemed to be admitted; and this is the express provision of the Code.

' Although, then, the judge might, according to the Code, render judgment without a jury in the absence of any answer or other defense, yet the record should show, as it does not in this case, that he heard evidence as to the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kraft v. BallbackCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API