Legal Opinion

Kambur v. Matto

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 1994No. 94-CA-650PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JiDUFRESNE, Judge.

This is an appeal by James Kambur, plaintiff-appellant, from a judgment dismissing his petition for executory process against an immovable in satisfaction of a note and mortgage on the grounds that the note had prescribed. For the following reasons we vacate *1080the judgment ruling that the note had prescribed, and remand the matter to the district court for further proceedings.

The obligation in this case derives from a $40,000.00 loan to Arthur Virgadamo by James Kambur, an attorney, on October 24, 1983. The loan was evidenced by a note of the same date which provided that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Home Finance Corp. v. FisherLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Crown Mortgage Corp. v. CarricoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Succession of VirgadamoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schoen v. WallingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API