Kambur v. Matto
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
JiDUFRESNE, Judge.
This is an appeal by James Kambur, plaintiff-appellant, from a judgment dismissing his petition for executory process against an immovable in satisfaction of a note and mortgage on the grounds that the note had prescribed. For the following reasons we vacate *1080the judgment ruling that the note had prescribed, and remand the matter to the district court for further proceedings.
The obligation in this case derives from a $40,000.00 loan to Arthur Virgadamo by James Kambur, an attorney, on October 24, 1983. The loan was evidenced by a note of the same date which provided that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Home Finance Corp. v. FisherLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
- Crown Mortgage Corp. v. CarricoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
- Succession of VirgadamoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schoen v. WallingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999