Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Hernandez

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 2014No. 2014-0517PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Relator, disciplinary counsel, charged Mary E. Hernandez of Cincinnati, Ohio, with the unauthorized practice of law for distributing business cards representing herself as an attorney practicing in the areas of criminal, family, juvenile, and immigration law, and for preparing documents and correspondence on behalf of Miguel Galan-Rubio regarding immigration matters before the Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”), and the Executive Office for Immigration Review Cleveland Immigration Court (“Immigration Court”). Hernandez is not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Land Title Abstract & Trust Co. v. DworkenOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. PearlmanOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Akron Bar Ass'n v. GreeneOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. McGinnisOhio Supreme Court · 2013

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. Hernandez (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. Spicer (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  3. OHIO STATE BAR ASSOCIATION v. KLOSK Et Al.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API