Parks v. Columbia Loan Co.

Nichols, Judge.

1. While no motion to dismiss the bill ol exceptions is made in the present case, since the defendant in error raises the question of the court’s jurisdiction in its brief, the court feels that such contention should be answered. It is contended that the bill of exceptions was not served on the defendant in error after it was certified by the trial court, and therefore, since this service, required by Code (Ann.) § 6-911, was not perfected, the bill of exceptions should be dismissed although no' formal motion has been made.

Prior to the certificate of the trial judge in the bill…