Shang v. United States
United States Court of Claims
The Repórter-i statement of the case: * ■ The facts shown by the evidence in this case are set forth • in the opinion of the court. As the case was not appealable no findings of fact were filed.
1Opinion of the CourtWeldoN, J.
This suit was brought to recover the sum of $150 for an alleged overpayment in the entry of land as a homestead at the Los Angeles land office in the State of California. The facts established by the evidence are bi’iefly as fallows:
The claimant, Ramona Lopez, now Ramona Shang, a citizen of the United States, on March 20, 1896, made homestead entry of the north half of the northeast quarter and the northeast half of the northwest quarter of section 22, township 23 north, range 16 west, S. B. S. California, containing 120 acres; and upon June 27, 1899, on applying to commute her homestead…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- United States v. HealeySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Healey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1894