Legal Opinion
Gardner v. Consolidated Rail Corp. SEPTA
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 26, 1990No. 40 E.D. Appeal Docket 1989Published
1Opinion of the Court
524 Pa. 445 (1990)
573 A.2d 1016
Robert C. GARDNER, a minor by his parents and natural guardians, Russell Q. GARDNER and Eleanor Maisey, in their own right, Appellants,
v.
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION SEPTA and City of Philadelphia, Appellees.
Robert LYNCH, a minor, By and Through his mother, Charlesetta BROWN and Charlesetta Brown, Appellants,
v.
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK), Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail), Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) and City of Philadelphia, Appellees.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued October 27, 1989.
Reargued…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Mascaro v. Youth Study CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Morena v. South Hills Health SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Leong Ex Rel. Petagno v. TakasakiHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
- Gradel v. InouyeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.