Washington v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ONION, Judge.
The offense is robbery by assault; the punishment, enhanced under the provisions of Article 62, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., life.
In his first ground of error appellant complains of the admission into evidence of latent fingerprints lifted by the police from the right vent glass of the taxicab in which the alleged robbery took place following its recovery and testimony concerning comparison of the same with known prints of the appellant taken while in custody.
Appellant urges that at the time the appellant’s prints were taken for the purposes of comparison he was under illegal…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- De La Rosa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Washington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968