Legal Opinion
Ellis v. Beemiller, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 19, 2012No. Civil Action No. 09-1414PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BLOCH, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendant Beemiller, Inc.’s and Defendant MKS Supply, Inc.’s Motion for Sanctions (Doc. No. 54). For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion will be granted.
I. Standard for Sanctions
Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides, in relevant part:
Every pleading, written motion, and other paper must be signed by at least one attorney of record in the attorney’s name____ By presenting to the court a pleading, written motion, or other paper — whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating it — an…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Susan Mary Kamen v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., Patricia McDonald and Carol BuckhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Szabo Food Service, Inc. v. Canteen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Colburn v. Upper Darby TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Adolf Lony v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Keister v. PPL Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Young v. SmithDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- LEAVITT v. SKY WARRIOR BAHAMAS LIMITEDDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025