Legal Opinion
United States v. Greenhaus
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 20, 1937PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
This is a motion by the appellant Greenhaus to amend the' mandate of this court which has been withheld under our opinion in United States v. Greenhaus, 85 F.(2d) 116, 107 A.L.R. 630, to give him an opportunity to apply for Executive Clemency, which has now been denied. The judge in the court below sentenced him for the following terms:
“Three years on counts 1-3-5-7-9-11-13.
“Two years on count 15 to run concurrently.
“Five years on counts 2-4-6-8-10-12-14 concurrently,
“Sentence on even numbered counts to begin at the expiration of sentence on odd numbered counts. Sentence on even numbered…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- White v. PearlmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- United States v. GreenhausCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
3Cited by8 opinions
- Espinoza v. SabolCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Grant v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
- Mills v. AderholdCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- William Brown v. J. C. Taylor, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- Remer v. ReganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.