Legal Opinion

Ponder v. Gambrell

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 11, 1986No. 17965-CWPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, Linda Ponder, instituted this action for redhibition arising out of the sale of a home naming as defendants, the vendors, Danny and Janet Gambrell. Plaintiff sought rescission of the sale or in the alternative, damages. Defendants filed a peremptory exception of prescription alleging that the plaintiffs claim had prescribed. After a hearing on the exception, the trial court held that plaintiffs claim as to the rescission of the sale had prescribed under the one year prescriptive period applicable to actions for redhibition. However, the trial court held that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ppg Industries, Inc. v. Industrial Laminates CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  2. Crowley Grain Drier, Inc. v. FontenotLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Stratton-Baldwin Co., Inc. v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Ark-La-Tex Builders & Realty, Inc. v. HogeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Molbert Brothers Poultry & Egg Co. v. MontgomeryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Manning v. Scott-Hixson-Hopkins, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Idacon, Inc. v. Arnold Construction Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API