Legal Opinion
Swartout v. Van Auken
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 1, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, J.
An automobile driven by the plaintiff and one owned by the defendant Sidney Van Auken, and operated by the defendant Helen A. Van Auken, collided at the intersection of Goodman and Pearl streets in the city of Rochester. Each party seeks to recover damages for injury to his automobile. The jury found a verdict in favor of the defendant Sidney Van Auken for the full amount of the damages claimed.
The plaintiff was driving northerly on Goodman street and Mrs-Van Auken was proceeding easterly on Pearl street. The two cars came into collision at the intersection of the streets. The plaintiff *90testif…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Psota v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Van Blaricom v. . DodgsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Cohen v. NeustadterNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Koslovki v. International Heater Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Wood v. Coney Island & Brooklyn RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
3Cited by4 opinions
- Milgate v. WraithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Darrohn v. RussellCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935
- Stahl v. Niagara De Luxe Cab Co., New York County Courts1930
- Gochee v. WagnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931