Legal Opinion
Southern Michigan National Bank v. Byles
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided October 20, 1887PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Appeal from Kalamazoo. (Mills, J.) Petition by creditor to compel assignees to make proper dividend. Assignees appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtShertvood, J.
The Southern Michigan National Bank of Ooldwater owns and holds a note of which the following is a copy:
“ 11,102.63. Grand Rapids, Mich., August 10, 1883.
“ Three months after date, we promise to pay to the order of Chickering & Kyser eleven hundred and two and 63-100 dollars, at the Michigan National Bank, Kalamazoo, Michigan; value received.
“ Kellogg, Sawyer & Co.”
The note was made by Kellogg, Sawyer & Co., as accommodation makers for the payees, Chickering & Kyser.
The note was negotiated by the payees, and by them and Frank Chickering and Rice & Messmore indorsed; and the day before the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dickson v. ChornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
- Citizens' Bank v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880
- National Mount Wollaston Bank v. PorterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Armitage v. TollMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Mueller v. DobschuetzIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Third National Bank v. HaugMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Chapin v. DoddsMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Citizens' Bank v. Kendrick, Pettus & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1893
- Jewell v. ShermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
- Merchants National Bank v. FlippenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.