Legal Opinion · Dissent

Prezelski v. Christiansen

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided July 26, 1989No. 04-88-00089-CVPublished

1DissentPeeples, Justice

I respectfully dissent. The majority has reversed on the basis of a trial ruling that was within the court’s discretion, even though we have only a partial statement of facts, and any error was harmless.

1. Discretion to permit witnesses out of order. The trial judge was well within her discretion in allowing the defense to call two expert witnesses out of order. Trial judges are given discretion in determining the order in which witnesses testify. Ochoa v. Winerich Motor Sales Co., 127 Tex. 542, 94 S.W.2d 416, 421 (1936); Baker v. Sturgeon, 361 S.W.2d 610, 614 (Tex.Civ.App.—Texarkana 1962, no…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Gee v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. ReeseTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Morrow v. H.E.B., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Englander Co. v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1968

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API