Legal Opinion

Hanover Insurance Company v. Jennings

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 8, 1984No. 68730PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sognier, Judge.

William Jennings and his son, Jeff Jennings, brought this action on August 12, 1983, against Hanover Insurance Company to recover full optional personal injury protection (PIP) benefits under the automobile liability insurance policy issued by Hanover to William Jennings, as well as punitive damages, attorney fees, and penalties based on Hanover’s bad faith refusal to pay the claim in full. The trial court granted the Jennings’ motion for partial summary judgment on the issues of the additional PIP benefits and bad faith penalties and denied Hanover’s motion for summary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Flewellen v. Atlanta Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. MoweryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  3. Morris v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  4. First of Georgia Underwriters Co. v. BeckCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  5. Montgomery v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. International Indemnity Co. v. CoachmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  2. Occidental Fire & Casualty Co. of North Carolina v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  3. International Indemnity Co. v. CoachmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API