Legal Opinion

Conrad v. Dobmeier

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 29, 1896No. Nos. 9816-(32)Published

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Crow Wing county, Holland, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $1,074.17.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

The facts in this case sufficiently appear in the opinion filed on a former appeal. 57 Minn. 147, 58 N. W. 870. Subsequently the cause was brought on for a second trial, and, under instructions from the court, plaintiff obtained a verdict for substantial damages. The present appeal is from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

Several of the assignments of error go to rulings of the court whbreby plaintiff’s counsel were allowed to introduce the written *285■contract in evidence, the claim being that there was an entire failure to show its execution and delivery. A purported copy of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Conrad v. DobmeierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API