Legal Opinion

City of Lorain v. Griffith

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 1935No. 725PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By WASHBURN, PJ.

The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

Plaintiff brought her action against the defendant to recover damages for an injury which she suffered while using a crosswalk in one of the streets of the city, her claim being that the crosswalk was defective, and that because of such defect she fell and injured herself. The verdict was in her favor, and a judgment was entered against the city.

The city claims that said judgment should be reversed for the following errors: first, error in overruling the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict in its…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vitaro v. C. W. & P. Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Erb v. City of YoungstownOhio Court of Appeals · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API