Legal Opinion

Connor v. Union Pacific Railroad

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1998No. 970438PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSSON, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

Harry Duncan Connor appeals from a district court’s grant of Union Pacific Railroad Company’s motion for summary judgment. We reverse.

BACKGROUND

The following facts are undisputed for purposes of this appeal. On November 2, 1993, at approximately 11:30 a.m., Connor sustained catastrophic injury (traumatic amputation) to both arms when he was struck by a moving railcar in Union Pacific’s railyard facility in Salt Lake City, Utah. Connor — a 45-year-old, self-described transient from Chicago, Illinois — entered the railyard in the vicinity of 400 North Street and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jensen v. IHC Hospitals, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. MabeUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Thayne v. Beneficial Utah, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Lopez v. Union Pacific RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Feichko v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  2. Pepperwood Homeowners Ass'n v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API