Legal Opinion

Superior Beverage Co. v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 20, 1975No. Nos. 73-1309 to 73-1311PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before CHAMBERS and MERRILL, Circuit Judges, and PALMIERI,* District Judge. CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal from a decision of the Tax Court reported with a detailed factual description at 58 T.C. 918 (1972) assessing deficiencies in the income tax of each of the appellant corporations for the years 1966, 1967, and 1968. We reverse.

As a general rule under 26 U.S.C. § 11(d), every corporation is entitled to a yearly surtax exemption of $25,000. If a company is. a member of a “controlled group of corporations,” it is entitled to only its proportionate share of a single $25,000…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Tu-Vu Drive-In Corp. v. AshkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Casady v. Modern Metal Spinning & Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Superior Beverage Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Superior Beverage Company of Marysville, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Superior Beverage Company of Redding and Red Bluff, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Superior Beverage Company of Chico, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API