Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Friedman

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided February 21, 1949Published

1Opinion of the CourtSchimmel, J.

The plaintiff has moved for judgment on the pleadings under rule 112 of the Buies of Civil Practice, and the defendants have also moved for judgment under that rule.

The pleadings show the following facts, which are not in dispute: On June 10, 1948, one Jonkhoff, now deceased, sent a letter through the mails to a firm of attorneys, which read as follows: “ I am enclosing to you herewith a check to your order in the amount of $3,000.00, the proceeds of which you will pay over to my affianced wife Amalia Thomas, in the event of my death prior to our marriage ”. A check in the sum of $3,000,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Basket v. HassellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Duryea v. HarveyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  3. Cronin v. Chelsea Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. In re the Estate of DelapenhaNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
  5. Speaker v. KeatingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API