Legal Opinion

Jenkins v. Easco Aluminum Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 6, 2001No. COA00-22PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Judge.

Plaintiff was totally disabled as the result of her injuries from 17 May 1993 to 10 April 1994, and was paid temporary total disability pursuant to a Form 21 agreement during that time. The Industrial Commission approved the Form 21 agreement, which provided that defendants would pay compensation of $216.54 per week to plaintiff for “necessary” weeks. As a result of the agreement, plaintiff was “cloaked in the presumption of disability, and the burden was on the employer to rebut that presumption.” Saums v. Raleigh Community Hospital, 346 N.C. 760, 764, 487 S.E.2d 746, 750…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Peoples v. Cone Mills Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Saums v. Raleigh Community HospitalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  3. Kennedy v. Duke University Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Burwell v. Winn-Dixie Raleigh, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Lineback v. Wake County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Whitfield v. Laboratory Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. Gutierrez v. GDX AUTOMOTIVECourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Smith v. Beasley Enterprises, Inc./Red AppleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Jenkins v. Easco AluminumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. Smith v. BEASLEY ENTERPRISES/RED APPLECourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API