Legal Opinion

Murphy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 27, 1989No. 88-1594PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a sentence of a juvenile who was given adult sanctions. It is error to sentence a juvenile as an adult if section 39.111, Florida Statutes (1987) is not complied with.

*1158Here, as in Keith v. State, 542 So.2d 440 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989), the trial judge merely checked a checklist and did not comply with section 39.111(7)(d), Florida Statutes (1987). This statute requires the sentencing judge to “render a specific finding of fact and the reasons for the decision” in writing so they can be reviewed on appeal. Although we assume the sentencing judge put the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Keith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tighe v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Allen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API