Legal Opinion
MATTER OF WOLKOFF v. Chassin
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 14, 1996PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Kaye.
According to the Public Health Law, the Administrative Review Board for Professional Medical Conduct (ARB), which reviews physician disciplinary determinations, shall consist of five members — three physician and two lay members. This case challenges the validity of an ARB determination made by three physician members, without its two lay members. We conclude that action taken by a three-member quorum is valid and we therefore dismiss petitioner-doctor’s challenge.
In January 1994, the New York State Board for Professional Medical Conduct charged petitioner…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re the Appraisal for Taxation of the Property of BronsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Town of Smithtown v. HowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Kabnick v. ChassinNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Morris v. CashmoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Morris v. Cashmore, BurkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
3Cited by18 opinions
- Tall Trees Construction Corp. v. Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Village of Oak Park v. Village of Oak Park Firefighters Pension BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Kabnick v. ChassinNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Roosevelt Islanders for Responsible Southtown Development v. Roosevelt Island Operating Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- D'Ambrosio v. Department of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.