Legal Opinion

Maner v. Clark-Stewart Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 1, 1921No. 12329PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Certiorari; from Fulton superior court — Judge Ellis. February 2, 1921.

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. “ The first grant of a new trial upon certiorari will not be disturbed, unless the judgment under review by the certiorari was absolutely demanded.” Loftin v. Great Southern Asso., 9 Ga. App. 121 (1) (70 S. E. 353); Charles W. Tway Co. v. Hedenburg, 24 Ga. App. 520 (3) (101 S. E. 199).

2. Where a contract provides that a job shall be done by the use of specified materials, the owner for whom the work is to be done and the material is to be used is entitled to stand upon the express terms of the agreement; and the- fact that other and different materials, which were to some extent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cannon v. HuntSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Loftin v. Great Southern Home Benevolent Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  3. Charles W. Tway Co. v. HedenbergCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. J. A. Jones Construction Co. v. Greenbriar Shopping CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1971
  2. Maner v. Clark-Stewart Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  3. Robinson v. BaconCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API