Legal Opinion

In Re Lunde Construction Company

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 27, 1981No. 99-79PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarney, C.J.

Lunde Construction Company sought an Act 250 permit for a real estate development in Barre Town. Barre City, a separate municipal corporation, sought party status under 10 V.S.A. §§ 6084(b) and 6085(c), and under Environmental Board Rule 12(C), to protect its interests at the hearing before the District Environmental Commission, but was turned down. The request was also denied by the En vironmental Board. The City is appealing, claiming (i) that it was entitled to receive individual notice of the application under 10 V.S.A. § 6084(b) and thus party status under 10 V.S.A. § 6085(c), and (ii)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re PreseaultSupreme Court of Vermont · 1972
  2. John v. FernandezSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bevins v. KingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  2. In Re HalnonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  3. In re Maple Tree Place AssociatesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API