Legal Opinion

Valenzuela v. State ex rel. Eyman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1972No. 10605PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, Justice

Peter Munoz Valenzuela was convicted in 196S by a jury on five counts of violating A.R.S. § 36-1002.04, which is entitled “Minors inducing minors to violate narcotic drug laws * * This Court affirmed his conviction, State v. Valenzuela, 101 Ariz. 230, 418 P.2d 386 (1966).

In 1971, Valenzuela petitioned in the Superior Court of Pinal County for a writ of *136habeas corpus, alleging several procedural errors at the time of his sentencing by the Superior Court of Pima County in 1965. The petition for writ of habeas corpus was denied, “for the reason that the Supreme Court [had] affirmed the sentence…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. ValenzuelaArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Miller Rubber Co. of New York v. PeggsArizona Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sandoval v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  2. Brewer v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API