Legal Opinion

Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Board

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided June 18, 2014No. 13-P-548PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKafker, J.

Based on a 1987 Federal kidnapping conviction, the Sex Offender Registry Board (SORB or board) notified John Doe of his duty to register and his preliminary classification as a level three sex offender. Doe unsuccessfully contested both the registration requirement and the level of classification at an evidentiary hearing and in Superior Court.

On appeal, Doe argues that SORB lacks jurisdiction over him, obviating his need to register and rendering his classifica*483tian void. As his conviction was not in a Massachusetts court, this argument depends on the proper interpretation and application of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Gooch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. United States v. HealySupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. United States v. OsborneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. O'Neil v. Bank of New York MellonMassachusetts Superior Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API