Legal Opinion

Mayer v. Rabinowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 7, 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In a fraud action, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kunzeman, J.), dated April 10, 1984, which granted defendants’, Murray Rabinowitz and Harry Rabinowitz, motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to them for failure to state a cause of action.

Order affirmed, with costs.

The disclaimer clause in the contract of sale between the parties, which states in pertinent part that no written or oral representations were made by the sellers or by any third party with respect to the income of the property sold, is sufficiently specific to negate…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Danann Realty Corp. v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Wittenberg v. RobinovNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Barnes v. GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Barnes v. GouldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. Galvatron Industries Corp. v. GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Weiss v. ShapolskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Risbano v. 3rd & 60th AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API