United States v. Wertz
District Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL
HEMPHILL, District Judge.
Defendants’1 motion for a new trial, duly noted, was heard by this court, at Green-ville, July 5, 1979. The grounds for the motion are that the court should have suppressed2 certain testimony as hereinafter revealed.
Defendants seek to suppress certain statements made by the defendant Vaughn after Drug Enforcement Agent Odis Rousseau pointed a pistol at Vaughn’s midsection.
Prior to trial Vaughn had made a suppression motion, but this was abandoned as it appeared that there were . no grounds upon which the motion could be based. At that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. CeccoliniSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.