Lamar Advertising v. Larry & Vickie Nicholls, L.L.C.
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KITE, Justice.
[¶1] Lamar Advertising (Lamar) appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Larry and Vickie Nicholls, LLC (Nicholls). The district court ruled that a lease allowing Lamar to maintain a billboard on Nicholls property was void as an unreasonable restraint on alienation. We conclude that the district court applied the wrong legal test when it considered the reasonableness of the restraint. The correct test requires only a showing of a rational justification for the lease. Applying that test to the undisputed facts, we conclude, as a matter of law,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cook v. Shoshone First BankWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Spanish Oaks, Inc. v. Hy-Vee, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Wells Fargo Bank Wyoming, N.A. v. HodderWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Hartnett v. JonesWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- Alloway v. RT Capital, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Siltstone Resources, L.L.C. v. Ohio Pub. Works Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
- Banning Lewis Ranch Co. v. City of Colorado Springs (In re Banning Lewis Ranch Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2015
- Curtis v. Progressive Northern Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2022
- West 39th Street, LLC v. Lina, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024