Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Moreno v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 29, 1988No. 763-86Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partTeague, Judge

The facts of this cause make it clear to me that the day in question was a “dismal” day for Ricardo Moreno, henceforth appellant. The facts reflect that appellant, who was then highly intoxicated, was shot once in the hand and once in the stomach by the complainant, a Houston police officer, who was a much larger man than appellant, who is only four feet, six inches tall. Given what the majority opinion states, or perhaps does not state, it should also be a “dismal” day for the Courts of Appeals of this State, if not the criminal jurisprudence of this State.

A majority of this Court, operating…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Combs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Gold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Moreno v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API