Price v. Russell
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
KIEEITS, District Judge.
The complainant, asserting that he is a physician regularly admitted to practice and practicing for a long time within the state of Ohio and pursuant to its laws, and alleging a course of conduct, past, present, and prospective, conformable to law, and that he has a duty in his profession to advise medicines and to apply medical treatment which, in his opinion, may be calculated to meet the requirements of his respective patients, and further his belief, based upon experienced observation and instruction, that the use of intoxicating liquors, to be taken internally,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Hamilton v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.