Legal Opinion

Mullings v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 28, 1989No. 89-2129PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant, Carl Mullings, appeals from a trial court order denying his motion for post-conviction relief under rule 3.850, Flor*288ida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm the order of the trial court based upon a holding that the motion was untimely filed; and the issues raised therein were procedurally barred and/or without merit. Rose v. State, 472 So.2d 1155 (Fla.1985); Zeigler v. State, 452 So.2d 537 (Fla.1984); Brown v. State, 430 So.2d 446 (Fla.1983); Ford v. State, 407 So.2d 907 (Fla.1981); Ponder v. State, 530 So.2d 1057 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Paez v. State, 512 So.2d 263 (Fla. 3d DCA…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. Zeigler v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  3. Ford v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  4. Paez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  5. Ponder v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wilcox v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API