Legal Opinion

Merryman v. Hall

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1900PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to St. Clair; Vance, J. Case by Frederick I. Merryman against Edmund Hall for personal injuries. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The plaintiff sued the defendant to recover for injuries- received by him, caused by the explosion of the boiler upon a dredge owned by defendant. The cir. cuit judge directed a verdict for the defendant. The case is brought here by writ of error.

The defendant owned a dredge with which he was performing a contract he had with the government to do dredging in Black river. The plaintiff was an inspector looking after the work on the part of the government. He had nothing to do with the management of the dredge. He went aboard the dredge on the morning of May 25th. After the dredge had been in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carver v. Detroit & Saline Plank Road Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Davis v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Voigt v. Michigan Peninsular Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Parker v. Union Station Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Merryman v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Merryman v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API