Legal Opinion

Unruh v. Streight

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1980No. 11097PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This action was commenced by Eugene and Christine Streight seeking to recover the balance owed by Paul and Reta Unruh on a $100,000 promissory note. The note was secured by a deed of trust covering a 50-acre parcel in Douglas County which the Streights purchased for $30,000 at the foreclosure sale. The district court found that the fair market value of the property on the day of the foreclosure sale was $30,000 and, pursuant to NRS 40.455, 1 awarded the Streights a deficiency judgment of $70,000 plus interest and costs. This appeal followed.

NRS 40.455 allows a judgment creditor to seek…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Union Nat. Bk. of Ptgh. v. CrumpSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Tahoe Highlander v. Westside Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 1979

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. HalpernDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2010
  2. Douglas County Bank & Trust Co. v. StamperNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Halfon v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Pahrump 194, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2014
  5. Lee v. Verex Assurance, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API