Legal Opinion
In re Gordon
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided January 4, 2013No. 11-10045-MPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TERRENCE L. MICHAEL, Chief Judge.
Most litigation deals with past events. Bankruptcy cases often focus on the future. It may be the future of a reorganized business, or the collection and distribution of a debtor’s assets. Just as disputes arise out of past events, they can also be foreseen. The question before the Court is whether potential disputes may be the proper subject of compromise, and, if so, whether the compromise presented in this case should be approved. The following findings of fact and conclusions of law are made pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Protective Committee for Independent Stockholders of TMT Trailer Ferry, Inc. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bankruptcy Services, Inc. v. Ernst & Young (In Re CBI Holding Co.)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- In Re Carl Cottrell and Paula Cottrell, Debtors. Carl Cottrell and Paula Cottrell v. J. Baxter Schilling, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, a United States Corporation v. Bank of Boulder, a Colorado CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re: USA CricketUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2026