Legal Opinion

Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. v. Transcon Lines

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided May 31, 1983No. 80-C-236PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*53FINDINGS OF FACT and CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

REYNOLDS, Chief Judge.

This is an action brought under the Car-mack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 11707. Plaintiff Jos. Schlitz Brewing Company (Schlitz) seeks to recover for damages sustained to a cargo of empty beer cans transported by the defendant Transcon Lines (Transcon). A court trial was held from March 28 through April 5,1983. This constitutes the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 52(a).

FINDINGS OF FACT

The plaintiff Schlitz was in May of 1977 a corporation…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Elmore & StahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Eastern Motor Express, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee v. A. Maschmeijer, Jr., Inc., Defendant-Appellee-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  3. Wisconsin Electric Power Company, a Wisconsin Corporation v. Zallea Brothers, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  4. Martin Imports v. Courier-Newsom Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  5. Armour Research Foundation of Illinois Institute of Technology v. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co., a Wisconsin Corporation v. Transcon Lines, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Beautifax, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Marine Management, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API