State v. Lamar
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
We have for review the Second District’s decision in Lamar v. State, 648 So.2d 775 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994), in which the district court certified the following question of great public importance:
WHERE A DEFENDANT IS SENTENCED AT THE SAME SENTENCING HEARING FOR A NEW FELONY AND A VIOLATION OF PROBATION GROUNDED UPON THE NEW FELONY, IS THE TRIAL COURT LIMITED TO A ONE-CELL INCREASE FROM THE ORIGINAL SCORESHEET UNDER THE GUIDELINES FOR THE VIOLATION OF PROBATION, PURSUANT TO GRADY v. STATE, 618 S0.2D 341 (FLA. 2D DCA 1993), OR CAN THE TRIAL COURT IMPOSE THE MOST SEVERE SENTENCING SCHEME PERMISSIBLE…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Peters v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- State v. TitoSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- State v. StaffordSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Grady v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Lamar v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. MeeksSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Adekunle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Moses v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Watson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Meeks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.