Legal Opinion

McDaniels v. Hall

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided February 5, 1968No. 24832PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROSS, Judge.

Plaintiff sued to recover $5,000.00 damages for bodily injuries allegedly sustained in a collision between automobiles driven by the respective parties. Upon trial to a jury plaintiff’s case was submitted solely under the rear end doctrine. The jury returned a unanimous verdict in favor of defendant, upon which judgment was duly entered. Thereafter, and more than thirty days after filing date, plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was sustained on the ground the trial court erred in giving defendant’s Instruction No. 4 submitting the issue of plaintiff’s contributory negligence.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Highfill v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  2. Miller v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  3. O'NEILL v. ClaypoolSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  4. Hawkeye-Security Insurance Co. v. Thomas Grain Fumigant Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Levin v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Thomas v. FitchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Joly v. WipplerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  3. Young v. GrotskySupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  4. Furlow v. Laclede Cab CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Huff v. TrowbridgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API