Legal Opinion

Philco-Ford Corp. v. Holland

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 4, 1977No. 76-408PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

The only issue in this case is the constitutionality of an Arkansas statute permitting a nonresident corporation to be sued in a contract action in the county where the plaintiff resides.

The lower court overruled Philco-Ford Corporation’s motion to quash service and from that order, Philco-Ford, the petitioner, requests a writ of prohibition against the circuit judge from proceeding further.

Philco-Ford is a non-resident corporation which has an agent for service in Pulaski County, Arkansas. It has no principal place of business or chief officer in the State. It was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Power Manufacturing Co. v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. American Motorists Insurance Co. v. StarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Cavette v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Equity Fire & Casualty Insurance v. ColemanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Desoto Gathering Co. v. RamseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  3. Desoto Gathering Co. v. RamseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API