Philco-Ford Corp. v. Holland
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Darrell Hickman, Justice.
The only issue in this case is the constitutionality of an Arkansas statute permitting a nonresident corporation to be sued in a contract action in the county where the plaintiff resides.
The lower court overruled Philco-Ford Corporation’s motion to quash service and from that order, Philco-Ford, the petitioner, requests a writ of prohibition against the circuit judge from proceeding further.
Philco-Ford is a non-resident corporation which has an agent for service in Pulaski County, Arkansas. It has no principal place of business or chief officer in the State. It was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Power Manufacturing Co. v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- American Motorists Insurance Co. v. StarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cavette v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
3Cited by3 opinions
- Equity Fire & Casualty Insurance v. ColemanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Desoto Gathering Co. v. RamseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
- Desoto Gathering Co. v. RamseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016