Legal Opinion

Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. Eastwood

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*323OPINION

By FARR, J.

The first claim of error was that the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence and is contrary to law; second, the trial court erred in overruling the defendant’s motion to direct a verdict both at the close of plaintiff’s testimony and third, at the conclusion of all the evidence, to which defendant below excepted; and the fourth is that the court erred in overruling the motion for new trial. The first, second and fourth claims of error may be considered together.

Having in mind the matters testified to by the various witnesses, there is no dispute but that Eastwood…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wilkie v. . StancilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Manfroy v. Craig-Curtiss Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Esber v. New York Life InsOhio Court of Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API