Legal Opinion

Fogg v. Oregon Short Line R. Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1931No. 4914PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEphraim Hanson, J.

The appellant railroad is engaged in interstate commerce, and respondent worked for it in repairing a bridge. The provisions of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 US CA §§ 51-59) are applicable to the case.

It is alleged that the respondent and his fellow laborers were engaged in removing stringers from the Washoe Slough Bridge under the orders and directions of a foreman. The stringers were timbers approximately 30 feet long, 17 inches wide, and 8 inches thick. In order to remove them from the bridge it was necessary that all members of the gang work in concert. To accomplish this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reed v. Director General of RailroadsSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Morgan v. Ogden Union Ry. & Depot Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Az v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  2. Az v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API