Legal Opinion

Mobile O. R. Co. v. Williams

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 23, 1933No. 1 Div. 721Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

FOSTER, Justice.

It is now apparent to us that we failed to note the effect of the contention of appellee, that the ruling of the circuit court on objection to certain features of the argument of plaintiff’s attorney for which the judgment was reversed should be construed in connection with charges numbered 12, 19, 20, and 31, given at the instance of appellant.

We are constrained to agree with appellee on rehearing that those charges clearly and effectually eliminated from the jury consideration of those features of rule 1228, to'which the argument related, and which we think…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. American Ry. Express Co. v. ReidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Birmingham Ry., Light & Power Co. v. LittletonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. Empire Coal Co. v. GoodhueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API