Klein v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Craig,
In this appeal from the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal • Board by claimant Paul Klein, the central question is whether the referee’s denial of benefits, affirmed by the board, was based upon a capricious disregard of evidence by the referee, who concluded that the cause of the claimant’s mental disability arose, not from the claimant’s employment as chief *249executive officer of the financially distressed defendant Plaza Home'Center, Inc., but instead came from the threat of financial loss in connection with his ownership interest, if any, in the corporation.
Work-related…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- University of Pittsburgh v. PerlmanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board & Guida v. Precisionware, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Tady v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
3Cited by12 opinions
- McCoy v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Globe Security Systems Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Lowe v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Washington Food Specialties, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Globe Security Systems Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Guerrero)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.