Legal Opinion

Yam's, Inc. v. Moore

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 19, 1994No. 94-549PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

This is a malicious prosecution case. The appellee, Shirley Moore, was awarded compensatory damages of $20,000 and punitive damages of $10,000 against the appellant, Yam’s, Incorporated (Yam’s). Ms. Moore alleged that Yam’s maliciously prosecuted her for stealing a washer and dryer she rented from Yam’s and later reported stolen from her by a third party. Yam’s contends Ms. Moore’s evidence was insufficient to go to the jury. It also contends there were errors requiring the granting of its motion for a new trial and remittitur. We agree there was error requiring the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Security Pacific Housing Services, Inc. v. FriddleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. John Cheeseman Trucking, Inc. v. DouganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. First Commercial Bank, N.A. v. KremerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Bruns v. BrunsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Family Dollar Trucking, Inc. v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
  2. Thomas v. OlsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. Family Dollar Trucking, Inc. v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
  4. Family Dollar Trucking, Inc. v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API