Arce v. Wackenhut Corp.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtShepherd, J.
The issue on this appeal is whether a concededly authentic document, purporting to be a transcription by an unidentified employee of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), of a summary dictated by an unidentified representative of the FBI, of an interview conducted either by that individual or another, is admissible in evidence under the public records exception to the hearsay rule codified in section 90.803(8) of the Florida Statutes (2008). In the balance lies the validity of an adverse summary final judgment suffered by Appellant, the plaintiff in a defamation action filed by him…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Davis v. ParksSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
- Lee v. DHRSSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- Valderrama v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Michel v. Merrill Stevens Dry Dock Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
3Cited by6 opinions
- Siegel v. Tower Hill Signature Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Benjamin v. Tandem Healthcare, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Penzera v. O'NealDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Arce v. Wackenhut Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Cynthia L. Jackson v. Household Finance Corporation IIISupreme Court of Florida · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.