Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Utica Mutual Insurance v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 16, 1997No. A97A0781Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBeasley, Judge

1. The trial court was not precluded from reaching the merits of plaintiff’s claim because it did have jurisdiction of it.

Mitchell, the former ward, filed an “action to set aside dismissal of [the guardian of plaintiff’s property]” in the superior court. She amended it once to detail certain alleged irregularities with respect to fulfillment of the guardian’s duties and to seek a final accounting and settlement in the superior court. In her original complaint, she had asked the superior court to permit her to file with the probate court a petition for final accounting and settlement.

As…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Murphy v. MurphySupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  2. Okekpe v. Commerce Funding Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  3. Herring v. Standard Guaranty InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  4. Atlanta Trust Co. v. National Bondholders Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  5. Evans v. LittleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API