Legal Opinion

People v. Pitkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that the testimony of the accomplice was not sufficiently corroborated (see, CPL 60.22; People v La Porte, 217 AD2d 821, 821-822). The evidence is legally sufficient to support the conviction (see, People v Yopp, 142 AD2d 982, 983, lv denied 72 NY2d 1051), and the verdict is not contrary to the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). *1022Defendant’s contention that the verdict is repugnant is not preserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Alfaro, 66 NY2d 985, 987), and we decline…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. IannoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. People v. AlfaroNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. People v. La PorteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. RussAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. People v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API