Legal Opinion

Laminack v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 17, 1923No. 7275Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for manufacturing intoxicating liquor; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

The indictment alleges, and the proof shows that the alleged offense was committed on November 10th, 1921. This was before the amended act of the 37th Legislature. C. 61, p. 233, 1st and 2d C. S., went into effect, and this prosecution therefore was controlled by the law passed at 2d C. S. Thirty-sixth Legislature. In order to charge an offense under that law it was necessary to negative the exceptions. Th.e indictment in the present case fails to do so. McNeil v. State, 91 Texas Crim.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Stringer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. McNeil v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API