Legal Opinion

Pettengill v. Gilman

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 15, 1967No. 1994PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holden, G.J.

This action in tort was instituted against two infant defendants, Ronald Gilman and Frederick Sumner. The plaintiffs seek recovery for fire damage to their dwelling and other real property. The complaint alleges the fire was wilfully and maliciously caused by the defendants, acting in concert. One parent of each child was joined as party defendants. The suit was subsequently discontinued as to the defendants Sumner. This interlocutory appeal concerns only Ronald Gilman. No question of his parent’s derivative liability is before us.

Counsel for the plaintiffs and the remaining minor…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re DobsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
  2. White v. JoyceSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Bielawski v. BurkeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1959
  4. Greene v. MabeySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1912
  5. Starbird v. MooreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1848

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Morissette v. MorissetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  2. Maine National Bank v. PetrlikSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
  3. In Re M.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  4. Dartmouth Savings Bank v. Estate of Schoen Ex Rel. AinsworthSupreme Court of Vermont · 1971
  5. Arsenault v. CarrierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API